Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. L-2456 January 25, 1949
NICOLAS B. POTOT, petitioner,
vs.
JUAN L. BAGANO, the SECRETARY OF JUSTICE and the JUDGE OF COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF CEBU, respondents.
Ramon Deterte, Gaudioso P. Montecillo and Cecilio V. Gillamac for petitioner.
Solicitor General Felix Bautista Angelo and Solicitor Felix V. Makasiar for respondent, Secretary of Justice, and Juan L. Bagano for himself.
TUASON, J.:
This is a quo warranto proceeding instituted by a prewar justice of the peace whose position was filled by the appointment and confirmation of the respondent after liberation.
The facts bring this case within the authority of Luis Floresca vs. Amparo Quetulio, supra, p. 128 and Domingo Maddumba vs. Roman Ozaeta, supra, p. 345. Petitioner's acceptance of other public offices incompatible with judicial function operate as an abandonment of the position to which he seeks reinstatement.
It remains the petitioner was appointed justice of the peace for the municipality of Pilar, Province of Cebu, in November, 1933. He had held that office until April 25, 1944 (Exhibits 1 and 2), when he ceased to act for reasons not disclosed in the record. On August 19, 1945, the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace of San Francisco, Poro and Tudela, Vicente de Roda, was extended to comprise the municipality of Pilar (Exhibits 3, 4, and 5). Vicente de Roda was later succeeded by Felixberto R. Sosmeña, who was justice of the peace until April 14, 1946. From the latter date September 1, 1946, the office of justice of the peace of Pilar was vacant. It was on the last mentioned date that the respondent entered upon the performance of his duties in that office.
Petitioner joined the police force of the City of Cebu as lieutenant from June 11, 1947, to January 15, 1948 From January 16, 1948, to April 24 of the same year, he was Assistant Provincial Warden (Exhibits A, B, and C.)
That petitioner was forced to seek or accept jobs in order to live would not alter the case even if we assume, for the sake of argument, that economic necessity was a valid plea. The government was not the only source of gainful employments that could have tide him over while waiting, as he says, for reappointment to his old position. The truth is that for almost two years after liberation, before he accepted other government positions, he got position was without any permanent incumbent, he did not enter public service, and he did not raise a finger to claim his judicial post. It would seem that he lost all interest in the same until he changed his mind or found he had is dismissed with costs.
The petition is dismissed with costs.
Moran, C. J., Paras, Feria, Pablo, Bengzon, Briones and Montemayor, JJ., concur.
The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation
