INCOME TAX; VAT; Documentary stamp tax; Exemption of NHA by virtue of RA 7279 - The general rule enumerated in Sec. 27(c) of the Tax Code of 1997 subjecting all corporations, government agencies, or instrumentalities and government-owned or controlled corporation, with the exemption of certain entities, if engaged in similar business, industry or activity as ordinary taxable corporation, is subject to further exception under Sec. 32(B)(7)(b) thereof. Pursuant thereto, income derived by the Government and its political subdivision from any public utility or from the exercise of governmental function, is excluded from their gross income.
Based on the definition of what constitutes the term government under Section 2 of the Introductory Provisions of Administrative Code of 1987 (E.O. 292), the National Housing Authority (NHA) is a government entity which undertakes various projects for mass housing and socialized housing and in the process of performing an essential government function is entitled to tax exemption. Pursuant to Sec. 19 of RA 7279, the NHA is exempt from payment of all taxes and charges of any kind, whether national or local, such as income and real taxes, VAT and documentary stamp tax and registration fees, including fees for the issuance of transfer certificate of titles. NHA is likewise exempt from the creditable withholding tax.
Finally, the tax exemption of NHA under RA 7279 on the sale of lots to the socialized housing project is not repealed by RA No. 8424. (BIR Ruling No. 071-98 dated May 25, 1998)
VAT; Exemption of Davao Light & Power Co. Inc. on importation of importation etc. - Under Sec. 10 of Act No. 3632 (Model Electric Light and Power Franchise Act dated December 7, 1929) which was incorporated as part of the legislative Franchise of Davao Light & Power Company, Inc., it shall pay a franchise tax of 2% of its gross earnings from the electric current sold or supplied, which shall be in lieu of any and all taxes of any kind , nature or description levied, by any authority, now or in the future on its rights and privileges. The enactment of the EVAT law, did not in any way alter, amend nor repeal the terms and conditions under which Davao Light is required to pay 2% of its gross earnings in lieu of any and all taxes of taxes of any kind, from which taxes the grantee is exempted. Moreover, RA 7716 as amended by RA 8241 specifically subject franchise grantee of electric utilities to only 2% franchise tax and thereby expressly exempting them from VAT.
Accordingly, Davao Light is exempt from VAT on its importation of machineries, equipment, spare parts, and implements exclusively used in the business of generating and selling electric light and power and shall be subject only to the 2% franchise tax imposed under Sec. 117 of the Tax Code of 1997. (BIR Ruling No. 072-98 dated May 27, 1998)
FINAL WITHHOLDING TAX; DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAX; Gains/losses on SWAP of shares - The gains that will be realized by EAHDI from the transfer of the M & M shares of MHC in exchange for the latter's shares shall be determined by considering that the selling/transfer price of the M & M shares to MHC in exchange for the latter's shares shall be the fair market value of the shares received and not the fair market value of the shares transferred or exchanged.
Considering that the MHC shares are listed in the PSE., the fair market value of the MHC shares shall be the highest closing price in the stock exchange on the day of the execution of the Deed of Exchange between EAHDI and MHC.
Considering further that the M & M shares is unlisted shares, the gains to be realized by EAHDI from the intended transfer of shares of MHC shall be subject to the final tax of 5%/10% capital gains tax under Sec. 27 (1)(2) of the Tax Code of 1997.
Finally, the original issuance of MHC shares gives rise to neither taxable gain nor deductible loss, whether the subscription price of the MHC shares is in excess of or less than the par value of the MHC shares. However, the original issuance of MHC shares are subject to the documentary stamp tax under Section 175 of the Tax Code. (BIR Ruling No. 075-98 dated May 27, 1998)
DONORS TAX; Donation Mortis Causa - Donations/gifts made which are intended to take effect upon the death of the donor partake the nature of testamentary provision and the same shall remain part of the donor-decedent's gross estate at the time of his/her death even if the same have been donated in favor of the donee. Hence, the provision relative to the imposition of estate tax on transfers in contemplation of death shall apply but the donation/gifts are exempt from donor's tax.
However, since a donation mortis causa takes effect only upon the death of the donor, the real properties subject to the donation cannot be transferred in the name of the donee and shall thereby remain the properties of the donor. Meanwhile, the Donation Mortis Causa can be properly annotated at the back of the TCT by the concerned Register of Deeds to protect the right of any person who may be affected by the said donation. (BIR Ruling No. 081-98 dated May 28, 1998)
VAT; GTZ Projects - Section 3 of RR No. 6-97 implementing RA 8241 provides that only those services rendered to persons or entities whose exemption is clearly provided under international agreements to which the Philippines is a signatory, are effectively subject to 0% VAT. The Bilateral Agreement between the German Federal Government and the Government of the Philippines partakes the nature of an international agreement and is a valid source of tax exemption even without legislative concurrence. Moreover, the restriction on the use of funds under the Bilateral Agreement is, in effect, a grant of tax exemption.
Accordingly, GTZ Projects/Project Consultant may not legally be passed on with the Vat otherwise due from DAP for conducting Training Needs Analysis with the BIR. (BIR Ruling No. 084-98 dated June 2, 1998)
DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAX; RMO 8-98 - Denying the request of Jacinto & Jacinto for the temporary suspension of RMO No. 8-98 for lack of legal basis, citing the Supreme Court decision in the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Construction Resources of Asia, Inc. and CTA, L-68230, Nov. 25, 1986, 14 SCRA 671) that " the delivery of the certificates of stock to the x x x stockholders, whether actual or constructive, is not essential for the documentary stamp taxes to attach. What is taxed is the privilege of issuing shares of stock and, therefore, the tax accrue at the time the shares are issued x x x." (BIR Ruling No. 086-98 dated June 3, 1998)
RP-JAPAN TAX TREATY - Income payments made by ATS Construction International, Inc. to Showa Astec Co.,Ltd., a non-resident foreign corporation organized and existing under the laws of Japan, for technical supervision rendered during the period July 25 to October 31, 1996 which is equivalent to 98 days shall be subject to tax in Japan pursuant to Art. 14 (1) and (2) of the RP-Japan Tax Treaty. However, the sale of services by Showa Astec Co., Ltd. to ATS Construction International, Inc. is subject to the 10% VAT pursuant to Sec. 102 of the Tax Code, as amended RA No. 7716. (BIR Ruling No. 089-98 dated June 15, 1998)
DONOR'S TAX; CARL; Exemption of displaced farmers/tenants - Pursuant to Section 66 of RA No. 6657, otherwise known as the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of 1988, transactions involving transfer of ownership shall be exempted from the payment of registration fees and all other taxes and fees for the conveyance or transfer thereof. The subsequent donation of homelots, including the building of replacement houses at the relocation site, to the displaced beneficiaries which was made to comply with the relocation of the displaced workers as required by Administrative Order No. 1 S.1990, is exempt from donor's tax since the same is deemed to be within the coverage of the comprehensive agrarian reform process. On the other hand, entitlement to disturbance compensation does not pertain to transactions involving transfer of ownership but to the income/produce as a result of conversion, thus, is subject to income tax. Accordingly, donations of homelots, including replacement houses built on the relocated site, made by the Science Park of the Philippines, Inc. in favor of tenants/farm workers are exempt from donor's tax imposed under then Sec. 91 of the Tax Code [now Sec. 98, Tax Code of 1997] (BIR Ruling No. 100-98 dated June 29, 1998)
PERCENTAGE TAX; DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAX; Gains from Transfer of Receivables - The gain to be realized by EADPC from the assignment of its receivables to Solivest Corporation in exchange for the latter's common shares of stock of EAPRC shall be the excess of the amount realized therefrom over the cost or adjusted cost of said receivables, and the loss to be recognized by EADPC from the assignment of said receivables shall be the excess of the cost or adjusted cost of the receivables over the amount realized, which amount is determined by considering the selling/transfer price based on the fair market value of the property received and not the fair market value of the receivables transferred, pursuant to Section 40 (A) of the Tax Code of 1997
Moreover, considering that the EAPRC shares are listed shares and their transfer to EADPC shall be coursed through a cross-sale in the stock exchange, the fair market value of the shares shall be the actual selling price as shown in the sale confirmation issued by the member of the stock exchange, wherein a percentage tax of ½ of 1% shall be imposed on the gross selling price. The transfer of EAPRC shares shall also be subject to documentary stamp tax at the rate of One Peso and Fifty Centavos (P1.50) on each Two Hundred Pesos (P200.00), or a fractional part thereof, of the par value of said shares pursuant to Section 176 of the same Code. (BIR Ruling No. 115-98 dated July 28, 1998)
FINAL TAX; DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAX; Meaning of the terms "lending investor", "similar arrangement", "lending or gross-lending activities", Inter-office Memo - Section 27(D)(1) of the Tax Code of 1997 refers to the 20% final tax being imposed on the interest income on currency bank deposit and yield or any other monetary benefit from deposit substitutes and from trust funds and similar arrangement derived by lending institutions and banks. Thus, it has been ruled that borrowings/lendings obtained by a lending investor is in the nature of deposit substitutes. As to who is considered lending investor, this Office defined the term as "as one who makes practice of lending money for themselves or others at interest".
In view of the above-mentioned BIR rulings, this Office hereby holds that since the arrangement between ASB and its affiliate is in the nature of cash advances wherein the interest that is being charged to the affiliate-borrower is substantially the same interest the bank or financing institution charges the corporate debtor, the latter having merely passed on the same to its affiliate, ASB Realty Corporation is not a lending investor and its activity of borrowing from or lending money to its affiliate is not a "deposit substitute" contemplated under Section 22(Y) of the Tax Code of 1997. Neither will this kind of arrangement between affiliates be considered as "similar arrangement" mentioned in said Section 27(D)(1) of the same Code.
The term "similar arrangement" must necessarily be within the context of the definition of "Deposit Substitutes". But since the activity of borrowing and lending is exclusive to ASB and its affiliate, it cannot be categorized as activity falling under "similar arrangement" nor shall ASB and its affiliate be considered as non-bank financial intermediaries performing quasi-banking functions.
Moreover, the interests which ASB Realty Corp. or its affiliate charges from each other, depending as to who is the affiliate-borrower, do not constitute additional or real income to the affiliate-lender since it merely passes on to affiliate-borrower the interest which the creditor bank actually charges. While ASB or its affiliate charges the corresponding interest from either of them depending on who is the affiliate-borrower, the same is computed in such number of days the fund is actually used by the affiliate-borrower. Hence, the customary practice of borrowing/lending with interest being charged or paid by ASB or its affiliate, as the case may be, at the rate substantially equal to the rate the affiliate-debtor is liable to pay to the creditor bank , does not constitute as being engaged in lending or quasi-lending activities. Likewise, there being no income attributable from such arrangement, ASB Realty Corp. or its affiliate-borrower, as the case may be, is not required to withhold the 20% final tax on the said interest paid considering that neither of them is a lending investor.
On the matter of whether the corresponding interest on the amount so borrowed can be deducted as legitimate business expense, this Office opines that the corporate-debtor (i.e., the affiliate-lender) which initially borrowed the fund from the bank or any lending/financing institution and thereafter pays the corresponding interest thereon, may claim the same as legitimate business expense provided, however, that such interest receive from its affiliate-borrower but which thereafter is paid to the bank/financial institution, is reported as interest income for the purpose of computing the regular corporate income tax.
However, if the first borrower does not make use of its fund but instead relends it to an affiliate, it shall only be allowed interest expense duly deductible from its gross income if such relending activity actually generates income to it as the affiliate-lender. Otherwise, if no interest income is reported by an affiliate-lender from such activity, it cannot deduct as legitimate business expense the interest it initially paid to the bank since it did not actually assume such interest.
Finally, inter-office memo evidencing the lendings/borrowings which is neither a form of promissory note nor a certificate of indebtedness issued by the corporation-affiliate or a certificate of obligation, which are, more or less, categorized as "securities", is not subject to documentary stamp tax imposed under Sections 180, 174 and 176 of the Tax Code of 1997, respectively. Rather, the inter-office memo is being prepared for accounting purposes only in order to avoid the co-mingling of funds of the corporate affiliates. (BIR Ruling No. 117-98 dated July 30, 1998)
CAPITAL GAINS TAX; Sheriff's Certificate of Sale - A certified xerox copy attested by the sheriff-executor concerned of a Certificate of Sale over a real property is a sufficient basis for payment of capital gains tax, the original of which has been lost, considering that under Section 24, Rule 132 of the Revised Rules of Court, secondary evidence of a public document may be used as evidence, when it appears that the officer by whom they purport to be certified had the right to the custody of the record and had authority to furnish authenticated copies.
In settling the corresponding tax liability/ies arising from the latest auction sale, the present successor-in-interest, is not under any obligation to pay the tax liability of the predecessor-in-interest before being allowed to pay the tax due from the latest sale transaction. However, for purposes of registration of the Sheriff Certificate of Sale with the Registry of Deeds, both the tax liabilities of the predecessor-in-interest (seller) and that of the present successor-in-interest must first be settled before registration may be effected, pursuant to Section 56(A)(3) of the Tax Code of 1997. Should payment of both tax liabilities be made by the present successor-in-interest, the portion of such payment to the tax liability of the predecessor-in-interest may be reimbursed by the predecessor-in-interest pursuant to Article 22 of the Civil Code, should the former seek reimbursement of the same. (BIR Ruling No. 118-98 dated August 6, 1998)
WITHHOLDING TAX ON DIVIDENDS - The dividends to be received by Mr. Go Bun Pin from MERALCO is not subject to 30% withholding tax but to a final withholding tax of 6% beginning Jan. 1, 1998, 8% beginning Jan. 1, 1999 and 10% beginning Jan. 1, 2000 pursuant to Section 24(B)(2) of the Tax code of 1997, with the proviso that such tax on dividends shall apply only on income earned on or after January 1, 1998. Moreover, income forming part of retained earnings as of December 31, 1997 shall not, even if declared or distributed on or after January 1, 1998, be subject to the said withholding tax. (BIR Ruling No. 120-98 dated August 14, 1998)
INCOME TAX; Gains derived by a non-resident corporation not engaged in trade or business in RP- exempt from income tax - Any gain derive by Maha Ahmed Al-Juffali Food Distribution Systems Establishment (MAJ), a non-resident foreign corporation engaged in the wholesale of foodstuff/confectionery products, from selling Gandour products to Gandour Philippines, Inc. (GPI), a domestic corporation engaged in the manufacture, export and wholesale of goods such as candies, gums, sweets, chocolates, preserved fruits and confectionary goods in Saudi Arabia, under a Distributorship Agreement, will not be considered as Philippine source income and therefore exempt from the Philippine corporate income tax and withholding tax under Section 28(B)(1) of the Tax Code of 1997 and to the final withholding tax imposed under Section 57 of the same Code except capital gains tax under subparagraph 5(c) at the rate of 35% based on gross income during each taxable years, provided that effective January 1, 1998, the rate of income tax shall be thirty-four percent, January 1, 1999, 33% and January 1, 2000 and thereafter, 32%. (BIR Ruling No. 126-98 dated September 8, 1998)