CAPITAL GAINS TAX; Payment can be made by either party under exceptional circumstances - The claim of Mr. Cosino on the nullity of sale due to non-payment of the consideration when the Deed of Sale and the Affidavit submitted show otherwise, did not extinguish the right of this office to collect the capital gains tax and the corresponding surcharges thereon.
On the other hand, the RDO's duty is limited to what is clearly defined in Section 10 of the Tax Code. Thus, the concerned RDO cannot refuse the payment being tendered by Ms. Alcazar through Primetown Property Group on the basis of the claim of the seller which has to be proven in the proper forum. Once a taxable transaction is shown, the duty to collect is imperative.
Logically, the payment of capital gains tax must be done by the seller. However, experience has proven that there are instances when the seller does not assume, or does not want to pay the capital gains tax and the buyer is thereby left at the mercy of the seller if the latter does not or as a matter of fact refuses to pay. Equity and justice therefore, dictate that Sec. 49 of the Tax Code be construed to benefit both parties, extending the same right to pay the tax to either party under exceptional circumstances. (BIR Ruling No. 007-98 dated February 4, 1998)
CWT; Sale or exchange of real property by a corporation not habitually engaged in real estate business - Pursuant to RR No. 1-90 as amended by RR No. 12-94 any sale, exchange or transfer of real property whether capital or ordinary asset by a corporation which is not habitually engaged in the real estate business as certified by CREBA and which is not registered with HLURB as engaged in socialized housing projects under RR 7279 the selling price of which is over P2,000,000.00 shall be subject to a creditable withholding tax of 5% based on the gross selling price or total amount of consideration or its equivalent paid to the seller/owner. RR 1-90 as amended by RR 12-94 covers all types of sales, whether cash sale, sale on installment basis and sale on a deferred project basis. Thus, sales or installment basis are subject to the creditable withholding tax under RR 12-94 based on the gross selling price.
Moreover, the creditable expanded withholding and documentary stamp tax on sale of real property shall be based on the consideration or gross selling price exclusive of the 10% VAT. (BIR Ruling No. 008-98 dated February 5, 1998)
WITHHOLDING TAX; VAT - (1) Payments made by MTI to Sumitomo on the ISP and OSP portions of their contract and the payments made by Sumitomo to Nissho-Iwai on the ISP of the Contract, are subject to the 1% creditable withholding tax imposed on realty constructions under Sec. 19e)(1)(c) of RR No. 6-85, as amended.
(2) Sumitomo and Nissho-Iwai, being foreign corporations existing under the laws of Japan and having branches in the Philippines are considered "doing business in the Philippines and shall be taxed at 35% of their net income from sources within the Philippines.
(3) The total gross sale and receipts of Sumitomo on the contract with MTI is subject to 10% VAT. Likewise, the gross sale and receipts on the ISP of the sub-contract with Nissho-Iwai shall be subject to VAT. (BIR Ruling No. 016-98 dated February 6, 1998)
RMO No. 41-97; Even returns - RMO No. 41-97, Prescribed the Policies and Procedures in the implementation of "Even Returns" will not apply to the following: (1) corporation withholding tax for taxable year 1995 and prior years; (2) Individual income tax returns of expatriates voluntarily filing then returns but whose salaries are credited and received offshore; (3) Entities voluntarily remitting withholding tax on behalf of alien individuals who are not their employees and do no have control over the payment of the compensation of said alien individuals; and (4) Individual income tax returns of expatriates who are employed locally by a Philippine entity but who also receive income from offshore employer. (BIR Ruling No. 025-98 March 6, 1998)
Tax credit certificates issued by BOI - A Tax Credit Certificate (TCC) duly issued by the Board of Investment (BOI) pursuant to Article 21 of the Omnibus Investments Code of 1987 (E.O. 226) shall, upon proper application be allowed to be used in payment of documentary stamp tax liability. (BIR Ruling No. 026-98 dated March 6, 1998 citing BIR Ruling No. 115-96 dated October 31, 1996)
INCOME TAX; Income tax paid or accrued (now incurred) by a company within a taxable year not allowed as deduction - (a) BIR is prohibited from issuing further comments on Questions Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7 and 8 issued by the Energy Regulatory Board in relation to ERB Case No. 93-118 entitled "Meralco vs. Energy Regulatory Board, et. al." in so far as the rate fixing issue is concerned considering that the issues are all sub judice pending before the Court of Appeals. With regard to the question of whether the appraisal increase of property, plant and equipment of electric utilities is taxable, the general rule is that, mere increase in the value of property without actual realization, either through sale or other disposition, is not taxable. However, if by reason of appraisal, the cost basis of property is increased and the resulting basis is used as the new tax base for purposes of computing the allowable depreciation expense, the net difference between the original cost basis and new basis due to appraisal is taxable under the economic benefit principle.
(b) BIR is not following American Laws on taxation because we have our tax laws, including rules and regulations implementing our tax laws. However, under the doctrine of precedent, a court may apply American Laws or Court Decisions.
(c) The amendments introduced by EO No. 37 to then Section 21(c)(2) of the Tax Code of 1997 provides that dividend received by a citizen or resident alien from a domestic corporation is subject to income tax at the rate of 15% in 1986, 10% effective January 1, 1987, 5% effective January 1, 1988 and 0% effective January 1, 1989. However, Sec. 22 (a) and (b) of the same Code provides that dividends received by a non-resident alien individual, whether engaged or not in trade or business in the Philippines, from a domestic corporation is subject to final withholding tax of 30% of such dividend income.
(d) For purposes of computing the taxable income of domestic corporation derived form within and without the Philippines, the allowable deductions are limited to those provided under Section 29 of the Tax Code of 1997 for taxable year 1997 and prior years but for taxable year 1998, Section 34 of the Tax Code of 1997 governs.
(e) Pursuant to then Section 117 of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended by RA 8241, the 2% franchise tax of electric, gas and water utilities is based on gross receipts derived from the business covered by the law granting the franchise. (BIR Ruling No. 029-98 dated March 19, 1998)
INCOME TAX; Sale of property by Phil. Tubercolosis Society - Income derived by the Philippine Tuberculosis Society, Inc. (PTSI), a non-stock, non-profit, private charitable organization which operates the Quezon Institute and fifty (50) TB Centers nationwide, from the sale of its property in Zamboanga City to be used in the furtherance of its services in the prevention, control and treatment of tuberculosis and for charitable and social welfare purposes is not considered income from the productive use of its property because a single transaction of incidental character does not constitute PTSI as engaged in business. Said income is not subject to income tax imposed under Section 27 (c) of the Tax Code of 1997 subject to documentary stamp tax. (BIR Ruling No. 034-98 dated April 13, 1998 citing BIR Ruling Nos. 388-93 and 543-93; Xavier School, Inc., CTA Cast No. 1682 October 8, 1969)
INCOME TAX; Fees received for further maintenance services - Fees received in advance by FANUC Philippines Corporation from FANUC Ltd., a resident of Japan, for future maintenance services as embodied in their Maintenance Service Agreement, are not subject to income tax in the year of receipt, but should be considered earned income subject to income tax upon the performance or rendition of said service. (BIR Ruling No. 035-98 dated April 13, 1998)
CAPITAL GAINS TAX; Deed of Sale executed and notarized on March 27, 1979 -The sale of piece of land subject to a Deed of Sale executed and notarized on March 27, 1979 is not subject to the 5% capital gains tax because the provision of the Tax Code on the 5% capital gains tax under then Section 21 (e) of the Tax Code was not yet in existence because the Capital Gains Tax Law (BP Blg. 37) took effect only on September 7, 1979. Therefore, capital gains derived from the sale or transfer of real property classified as capital assets were then subject to the regular income tax rates. Likewise, it is not subject to the 7.5% EWT because EWT on the sales or transfers of real property other than capital assets was first introduced by Revenue Regulations No. 12-89 on December 21, 1989 only and the said Regulations provides that the same shall apply only to sales, exchanges or transfers of real properties classified as ordinary assets consummated after January 1, 1990. However, the Deed of Sale shall be subject to the documentary stamp tax based on the consideration stipulated in the Deed of Sale at the rate prevailing on March 27, 1979. (BIR Ruling No. 047-98 dated April 14, 1998)
DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAX; Notes to be issued qualify as public issue of bonds indebtedness - The Notes which will be used in a particular form, indicating therein the undertaking of Benpres Holding Corporation to pay interest at the rate of 7.875% per annum, is considered as a bonded indebtedness. Moreover, since the Notes will be offered to interested buyers who must be an institutional buyer (investment houses, securities firms, banks, etc.) and will be deposited with a custodian for the Depository Trust Company, the Notes justify as a public issue of bonds indebtedness.
The Notes which qualify as bonds or bonded indebtedness shall be subject to the documentary stamp tax under Sec. 174 of the Tax Code.
Interest income derived from the Notes by corporate residents of countries which have no tax treaty with the Philippines shall be subject to 20% withholding tax pursuant to Sec. 25(b)(5)(A) of the Tax Code. Interest income derived from the Notes by corporate residents of countries which have a tax treaty with the Philippines shall be subject to the tax rate provided in the treaty. (BIR Ruling No. 052-98 dated May 5, 1998)
INCOME TAX; Income derived by EYS & Associates exempt - Pursuant to Section 25(b)(1) of the Tax Code, as amended, to be subject to Philippine income tax, such income of non-resident foreign corporation not engaged in trade or business in the Philippines must have been derived in the Philippines. If the services are performed within the Philippines, such income is subject to a withholding tax of 35% on the gross income of the said non-resident foreign corporation. Since the services rendered by EYS & Associates were done outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Philippines, the retainer fee of $1,000 per month and override fee of 5% for shipments over $240,000 derived therein are considered as income from without the Philippines pursuant to Sec. 36(c)(3) of the Tax Code, as amended. Moreover, under existing treaty between the Philippines and the United States, a non-resident foreign corporation based in the US may be taxed and only by the latter if does not have a permanent establishment in the Philippines. Such being the case, the income earned by EYS & Associates from Company B is not subject to Philippine income tax. (BIR Ruling No. 059-98 dated May 21, 1998)
INCOME TAX; VAT; Documentary stamp tax; Exemption of NHA by virtue of RA 7279 - The general rule enumerated in Sec. 27(c) of the Tax Code of 1997 subjecting all corporations, government agencies, or instrumentalities and government-owned or controlled corporation, with the exemption of certain entities, if engaged in similar business, industry or activity as ordinary taxable corporation, is subject to further exception under Sec. 32(B)(7)(b) thereof. Pursuant thereto, income derived by the Government and its political subdivision from any public utility or from the exercise of governmental function, is excluded from their gross income.
Based on the definition of what constitutes the term government under Section 2 of the Introductory Provisions of Administrative Code of 1987 (E.O. 292), the National Housing Authority (NHA) is a government entity which undertakes various projects for mass housing and socialized housing and in the process of performing an essential government function is entitled to tax exemption. Pursuant to Sec. 19 of RA 7279, the NHA is exempt from payment of all taxes and charges of any kind, whether national or local, such as income and real taxes, VAT and documentary stamp tax and registration fees, including fees for the issuance of transfer certificate of titles. NHA is likewise exempt from the creditable withholding tax.
Finally, the tax exemption of NHA under RA 7279 on the sale of lots to the socialized housing project is not repealed by RA No. 8424. (BIR Ruling No. 071-98 dated May 25, 1998)
VAT; Exemption of Davao Light & Power Co. Inc. on importation of importation etc. - Under Sec. 10 of Act No. 3632 (Model Electric Light and Power Franchise Act dated December 7, 1929) which was incorporated as part of the legislative Franchise of Davao Light & Power Company, Inc., it shall pay a franchise tax of 2% of its gross earnings from the electric current sold or supplied, which shall be in lieu of any and all taxes of any kind , nature or description levied, by any authority, now or in the future on its rights and privileges. The enactment of the EVAT law, did not in any way alter, amend nor repeal the terms and conditions under which Davao Light is required to pay 2% of its gross earnings in lieu of any and all taxes of taxes of any kind, from which taxes the grantee is exempted. Moreover, RA 7716 as amended by RA 8241 specifically subject franchise grantee of electric utilities to only 2% franchise tax and thereby expressly exempting them from VAT.
Accordingly, Davao Light is exempt from VAT on its importation of machineries, equipment, spare parts, and implements exclusively used in the business of generating and selling electric light and power and shall be subject only to the 2% franchise tax imposed under Sec. 117 of the Tax Code of 1997. (BIR Ruling No. 072-98 dated May 27, 1998)
FINAL WITHHOLDING TAX; DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAX; Gains/losses on SWAP of shares - The gains that will be realized by EAHDI from the transfer of the M & M shares of MHC in exchange for the latter's shares shall be determined by considering that the selling/transfer price of the M & M shares to MHC in exchange for the latter's shares shall be the fair market value of the shares received and not the fair market value of the shares transferred or exchanged.
Considering that the MHC shares are listed in the PSE., the fair market value of the MHC shares shall be the highest closing price in the stock exchange on the day of the execution of the Deed of Exchange between EAHDI and MHC.
Considering further that the M & M shares is unlisted shares, the gains to be realized by EAHDI from the intended transfer of shares of MHC shall be subject to the final tax of 5%/10% capital gains tax under Sec. 27 (1)(2) of the Tax Code of 1997.
Finally, the original issuance of MHC shares gives rise to neither taxable gain nor deductible loss, whether the subscription price of the MHC shares is in excess of or less than the par value of the MHC shares. However, the original issuance of MHC shares are subject to the documentary stamp tax under Section 175 of the Tax Code. (BIR Ruling No. 075-98 dated May 27, 1998)
DONORS TAX; Donation Mortis Causa - Donations/gifts made which are intended to take effect upon the death of the donor partake the nature of testamentary provision and the same shall remain part of the donor-decedent's gross estate at the time of his/her death even if the same have been donated in favor of the donee. Hence, the provision relative to the imposition of estate tax on transfers in contemplation of death shall apply but the donation/gifts are exempt from donor's tax.
However, since a donation mortis causa takes effect only upon the death of the donor, the real properties subject to the donation cannot be transferred in the name of the donee and shall thereby remain the properties of the donor. Meanwhile, the Donation Mortis Causa can be properly annotated at the back of the TCT by the concerned Register of Deeds to protect the right of any person who may be affected by the said donation. (BIR Ruling No. 081-98 dated May 28, 1998)
VAT; GTZ Projects - Section 3 of RR No. 6-97 implementing RA 8241 provides that only those services rendered to persons or entities whose exemption is clearly provided under international agreements to which the Philippines is a signatory, are effectively subject to 0% VAT. The Bilateral Agreement between the German Federal Government and the Government of the Philippines partakes the nature of an international agreement and is a valid source of tax exemption even without legislative concurrence. Moreover, the restriction on the use of funds under the Bilateral Agreement is, in effect, a grant of tax exemption.
Accordingly, GTZ Projects/Project Consultant may not legally be passed on with the Vat otherwise due from DAP for conducting Training Needs Analysis with the BIR. (BIR Ruling No. 084-98 dated June 2, 1998)
DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAX; RMO 8-98 - Denying the request of Jacinto & Jacinto for the temporary suspension of RMO No. 8-98 for lack of legal basis, citing the Supreme Court decision in the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Construction Resources of Asia, Inc. and CTA, L-68230, Nov. 25, 1986, 14 SCRA 671) that " the delivery of the certificates of stock to the x x x stockholders, whether actual or constructive, is not essential for the documentary stamp taxes to attach. What is taxed is the privilege of issuing shares of stock and, therefore, the tax accrue at the time the shares are issued x x x." (BIR Ruling No. 086-98 dated June 3, 1998)
RP-JAPAN TAX TREATY - Income payments made by ATS Construction International, Inc. to Showa Astec Co.,Ltd., a non-resident foreign corporation organized and existing under the laws of Japan, for technical supervision rendered during the period July 25 to October 31, 1996 which is equivalent to 98 days shall be subject to tax in Japan pursuant to Art. 14 (1) and (2) of the RP-Japan Tax Treaty. However, the sale of services by Showa Astec Co., Ltd. to ATS Construction International, Inc. is subject to the 10% VAT pursuant to Sec. 102 of the Tax Code, as amended RA No. 7716. (BIR Ruling No. 089-98 dated June 15, 1998)
DONOR'S TAX; CARL; Exemption of displaced farmers/tenants - Pursuant to Section 66 of RA No. 6657, otherwise known as the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of 1988, transactions involving transfer of ownership shall be exempted from the payment of registration fees and all other taxes and fees for the conveyance or transfer thereof. The subsequent donation of homelots, including the building of replacement houses at the relocation site, to the displaced beneficiaries which was made to comply with the relocation of the displaced workers as required by Administrative Order No. 1 S.1990, is exempt from donor's tax since the same is deemed to be within the coverage of the comprehensive agrarian reform process. On the other hand, entitlement to disturbance compensation does not pertain to transactions involving transfer of ownership but to the income/produce as a result of conversion, thus, is subject to income tax. Accordingly, donations of homelots, including replacement houses built on the relocated site, made by the Science Park of the Philippines, Inc. in favor of tenants/farm workers are exempt from donor's tax imposed under then Sec. 91 of the Tax Code [now Sec. 98, Tax Code of 1997] (BIR Ruling No. 100-98 dated June 29, 1998)
PERCENTAGE TAX; DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAX; Gains from Transfer of Receivables - The gain to be realized by EADPC from the assignment of its receivables to Solivest Corporation in exchange for the latter's common shares of stock of EAPRC shall be the excess of the amount realized therefrom over the cost or adjusted cost of said receivables, and the loss to be recognized by EADPC from the assignment of said receivables shall be the excess of the cost or adjusted cost of the receivables over the amount realized, which amount is determined by considering the selling/transfer price based on the fair market value of the property received and not the fair market value of the receivables transferred, pursuant to Section 40 (A) of the Tax Code of 1997
Moreover, considering that the EAPRC shares are listed shares and their transfer to EADPC shall be coursed through a cross-sale in the stock exchange, the fair market value of the shares shall be the actual selling price as shown in the sale confirmation issued by the member of the stock exchange, wherein a percentage tax of ½ of 1% shall be imposed on the gross selling price. The transfer of EAPRC shares shall also be subject to documentary stamp tax at the rate of One Peso and Fifty Centavos (P1.50) on each Two Hundred Pesos (P200.00), or a fractional part thereof, of the par value of said shares pursuant to Section 176 of the same Code. (BIR Ruling No. 115-98 dated July 28, 1998)
FINAL TAX; DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAX; Meaning of the terms "lending investor", "similar arrangement", "lending or gross-lending activities", Inter-office Memo - Section 27(D)(1) of the Tax Code of 1997 refers to the 20% final tax being imposed on the interest income on currency bank deposit and yield or any other monetary benefit from deposit substitutes and from trust funds and similar arrangement derived by lending institutions and banks. Thus, it has been ruled that borrowings/lendings obtained by a lending investor is in the nature of deposit substitutes. As to who is considered lending investor, this Office defined the term as "as one who makes practice of lending money for themselves or others at interest".
In view of the above-mentioned BIR rulings, this Office hereby holds that since the arrangement between ASB and its affiliate is in the nature of cash advances wherein the interest that is being charged to the affiliate-borrower is substantially the same interest the bank or financing institution charges the corporate debtor, the latter having merely passed on the same to its affiliate, ASB Realty Corporation is not a lending investor and its activity of borrowing from or lending money to its affiliate is not a "deposit substitute" contemplated under Section 22(Y) of the Tax Code of 1997. Neither will this kind of arrangement between affiliates be considered as "similar arrangement" mentioned in said Section 27(D)(1) of the same Code.
The term "similar arrangement" must necessarily be within the context of the definition of "Deposit Substitutes". But since the activity of borrowing and lending is exclusive to ASB and its affiliate, it cannot be categorized as activity falling under "similar arrangement" nor shall ASB and its affiliate be considered as non-bank financial intermediaries performing quasi-banking functions.
Moreover, the interests which ASB Realty Corp. or its affiliate charges from each other, depending as to who is the affiliate-borrower, do not constitute additional or real income to the affiliate-lender since it merely passes on to affiliate-borrower the interest which the creditor bank actually charges. While ASB or its affiliate charges the corresponding interest from either of them depending on who is the affiliate-borrower, the same is computed in such number of days the fund is actually used by the affiliate-borrower. Hence, the customary practice of borrowing/lending with interest being charged or paid by ASB or its affiliate, as the case may be, at the rate substantially equal to the rate the affiliate-debtor is liable to pay to the creditor bank , does not constitute as being engaged in lending or quasi-lending activities. Likewise, there being no income attributable from such arrangement, ASB Realty Corp. or its affiliate-borrower, as the case may be, is not required to withhold the 20% final tax on the said interest paid considering that neither of them is a lending investor.
On the matter of whether the corresponding interest on the amount so borrowed can be deducted as legitimate business expense, this Office opines that the corporate-debtor (i.e., the affiliate-lender) which initially borrowed the fund from the bank or any lending/financing institution and thereafter pays the corresponding interest thereon, may claim the same as legitimate business expense provided, however, that such interest receive from its affiliate-borrower but which thereafter is paid to the bank/financial institution, is reported as interest income for the purpose of computing the regular corporate income tax.
However, if the first borrower does not make use of its fund but instead relends it to an affiliate, it shall only be allowed interest expense duly deductible from its gross income if such relending activity actually generates income to it as the affiliate-lender. Otherwise, if no interest income is reported by an affiliate-lender from such activity, it cannot deduct as legitimate business expense the interest it initially paid to the bank since it did not actually assume such interest.
Finally, inter-office memo evidencing the lendings/borrowings which is neither a form of promissory note nor a certificate of indebtedness issued by the corporation-affiliate or a certificate of obligation, which are, more or less, categorized as "securities", is not subject to documentary stamp tax imposed under Sections 180, 174 and 176 of the Tax Code of 1997, respectively. Rather, the inter-office memo is being prepared for accounting purposes only in order to avoid the co-mingling of funds of the corporate affiliates. (BIR Ruling No. 117-98 dated July 30, 1998)
CAPITAL GAINS TAX; Sheriff's Certificate of Sale - A certified xerox copy attested by the sheriff-executor concerned of a Certificate of Sale over a real property is a sufficient basis for payment of capital gains tax, the original of which has been lost, considering that under Section 24, Rule 132 of the Revised Rules of Court, secondary evidence of a public document may be used as evidence, when it appears that the officer by whom they purport to be certified had the right to the custody of the record and had authority to furnish authenticated copies.
In settling the corresponding tax liability/ies arising from the latest auction sale, the present successor-in-interest, is not under any obligation to pay the tax liability of the predecessor-in-interest before being allowed to pay the tax due from the latest sale transaction. However, for purposes of registration of the Sheriff Certificate of Sale with the Registry of Deeds, both the tax liabilities of the predecessor-in-interest (seller) and that of the present successor-in-interest must first be settled before registration may be effected, pursuant to Section 56(A)(3) of the Tax Code of 1997. Should payment of both tax liabilities be made by the present successor-in-interest, the portion of such payment to the tax liability of the predecessor-in-interest may be reimbursed by the predecessor-in-interest pursuant to Article 22 of the Civil Code, should the former seek reimbursement of the same. (BIR Ruling No. 118-98 dated August 6, 1998)
WITHHOLDING TAX ON DIVIDENDS - The dividends to be received by Mr. Go Bun Pin from MERALCO is not subject to 30% withholding tax but to a final withholding tax of 6% beginning Jan. 1, 1998, 8% beginning Jan. 1, 1999 and 10% beginning Jan. 1, 2000 pursuant to Section 24(B)(2) of the Tax code of 1997, with the proviso that such tax on dividends shall apply only on income earned on or after January 1, 1998. Moreover, income forming part of retained earnings as of December 31, 1997 shall not, even if declared or distributed on or after January 1, 1998, be subject to the said withholding tax. (BIR Ruling No. 120-98 dated August 14, 1998)
INCOME TAX; Gains derived by a non-resident corporation not engaged in trade or business in RP- exempt from income tax - Any gain derive by Maha Ahmed Al-Juffali Food Distribution Systems Establishment (MAJ), a non-resident foreign corporation engaged in the wholesale of foodstuff/confectionery products, from selling Gandour products to Gandour Philippines, Inc. (GPI), a domestic corporation engaged in the manufacture, export and wholesale of goods such as candies, gums, sweets, chocolates, preserved fruits and confectionary goods in Saudi Arabia, under a Distributorship Agreement, will not be considered as Philippine source income and therefore exempt from the Philippine corporate income tax and withholding tax under Section 28(B)(1) of the Tax Code of 1997 and to the final withholding tax imposed under Section 57 of the same Code except capital gains tax under subparagraph 5(c) at the rate of 35% based on gross income during each taxable years, provided that effective January 1, 1998, the rate of income tax shall be thirty-four percent, January 1, 1999, 33% and January 1, 2000 and thereafter, 32%. (BIR Ruling No. 126-98 dated September 8, 1998)