Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
A.M. No. P-06-2287 October 12, 2010
[Formerly A.M. No. 06-11391-MTC]
OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, Complainant,
vs.
MARCELA V. SANTOS, CLERK OF COURT II, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, SAN LEONARDO, NUEVA ECIJA, Respondent.
D E C I S I O N
PER CURIAM:
The Financial Audit Team of the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) conducted an audit at the Office of the Clerk of Court (OCC), Municipal Trial Court (MTC), San Leonardo, Nueva Ecija covering the accountability period from April 1, 1997 to May 31, 2006 of Marcela V. Santos, Clerk of Court II (respondent).
The audit team came up with the following findings:
I. MISSING OFFICIAL RECEIPTS1
1. SC O.R. No. I-799-2001-799050
2. SC O.R. No. II-7992051-7992100
3. SC O.R. No. IV-21701401-21701450
II. UNSUBMITTED MONTHLY REPORTS OF COLLECTIONS AND DEPOSITS2
| For Fiduciary Fund |
May 2003 to June 2003; |
| |
October 2003 to March 2006 |
| For SAJ |
November 2004 to March 2006 |
| For JDF |
March 2003 |
| |
November 2003 to March 2006 |
III. GENERAL FUND (CoCGF)3
Total Collections – January 1, 1998 to
November 10, 2003 |
₱ |
26,830.40 |
Total Deposit – January 1, 1998 to
November 10, 2003 |
|
26,827.40 |
| Balance – Shortage |
₱ |
3.00 |
IV. SPECIAL ALLOWANCE FOR THE JUDICIARY FUND4
| Total Collections November 11, 2003 to May 31, 2006 |
₱ |
30,066.80 |
| Total Deposit November 11, 2003 to May 31, 2006 |
₱ |
10,642.80 |
| Balance – Shortage |
₱ |
19,424.00 |
V. JUDICIARY DEVELOPMENT FUND (JDF)5
| Total Collections – June 1, 1997 to May 31, 2006 |
₱ |
87,185.00 |
| Total Deposit – June 1, 1997 to May 31, 2006 |
₱ |
60,503.80 |
| Balance – Shortage |
₱ |
26,681.20 |
VI. FIDUCIARY FUND6
| Beginning Balance per SUFF date June 19, 1997 |
₱ |
56,600.00 |
Add: Total Collections for April 1, 1997 to
May 31, 2006 |
|
452,600.00 |
Less: Total Withdrawals for April 1, 1997 to
May 31, 2006 |
|
178,100.00 |
Total Unwithdrawn Fiduciary Fund as of
May 31, 2006 |
|
331,100.00 |
| |
| Bank Balance as of May 31, 2006 |
|
7,614.65 |
| Less: Unwithdrawn Interest (net of tax 603.70) |
|
2,414.65 |
| Adjusted Bank Balance as of May 31, 2006 |
|
5,200.00 |
| |
| Unwithdrawn Fiduciary Fund as of May 31, 2006 |
|
331,100.00 |
| Adjusted Bank Balance as of May 31, 2006 |
|
5,200.00 |
| Balance of Accountability – Shortage |
₱ |
325,900.00 |
| |
VII. UNSUPPORTED WITHDRAWN CASH BOND7
| Case No. |
Name of Litigants |
Documents Lacking |
| 84/85-94 |
Amelia Vallarta |
Acknowledgment Receipt |
| 12-95 |
Francisco Ingal |
Court Order |
| 92-99 |
Eric Garcia |
Acknowledgment Receipt
Court Order |
| 104-00 |
Zoilo Ngo |
Acknowledgment Receipt |
| 11-03 |
Nida Manaois |
Acknowledgment Receipt |
VIII. EARNED INTEREST FROM SAVINGS ACCOUNT No. 1531-0427-23 NOT YET TRANSFERRED TO THE JDF ACCOUNT8
| PERIOD COVERED |
GROSS INTEREST |
WITHHOLDING TAX< |
NET INTEREST |
| 30-Jun-99 |
4.56 |
0.91 |
3.65 |
| 30-Sep-99 |
5.23 |
1.05 |
4.18 |
| 31-Dec-99 |
-- |
|
- |
| 31-Mar-00 |
52.39 |
10.48 |
41.91 |
| 30-Jun-00 |
179.86 |
35.97 |
143.89 |
| 30-Sep-00 |
209.52 |
41.90 |
167.62 |
| 31-Dec-00 |
210.38 |
42.08 |
168.30 |
| 31-Mar-01 |
206.65 |
41.33 |
165.32 |
| 30-Jun-01 |
209.78 |
41.96 |
167.82 |
| 30-Sep-01 |
188.74 |
37.75 |
150.99 |
| 31-Dec-01 |
179.98 |
36.00 |
143.98 |
| 31-Mar-02 |
130.68 |
26.14 |
104.54 |
| 30-Jun-02 |
107.16 |
21.43 |
85.73 |
| 30-Sep-02 |
65.29 |
13.06 |
52.23 |
| 31-Dec-02 |
65.42 |
13.08 |
52.34 |
| 31-Mar-03 |
136.33 |
27.27 |
109.06 |
| 30-Jun-03 |
207.93 |
41.59 |
166.34 |
| 30-Sep-03 |
195.54 |
39.11 |
156.43 |
| 31-Dec-03 |
146.77 |
29.35 |
117.42 |
| 31-Mar-04 |
123.94 |
24.79 |
99.15 |
| 30-Jun-04 |
92.38 |
18.48 |
73.90 |
| 30-Sep-04 |
87.84 |
17.57 |
70.27 |
| 31-Dec-04 |
88.03 |
17.61 |
70.42 |
| 31-Mar-05 |
88.54 |
17.71 |
70.83 |
| 30-Jun-05 |
29.29 |
5.86 |
23.43 |
| 30-Sep-05 |
6.12 |
1.22 |
4.90 |
| 31-Dec-05 |
-- |
- |
- |
| 31-Mar-06 |
-- |
- |
- |
| TOTAL |
₱ 3,018.35 |
₱ 603.70 |
₱ 2,414.65 |
IX. PHILIPPINE MEDIATION FUND9
| Total Collections – August 1, 2004 to May 31, 2006 |
₱ |
10,000.00 |
| Total Deposit – August 1, 2004 to May 31, 2006 |
|
250.00 |
| Balance – Shortage |
₱ |
9,750.00 |
X. SUMMARY OF TOTAL ACCOUNTABILITY10
| For General Fund |
₱ |
3.00 |
| For Special Allowance for the Judiciary Fund |
|
19,424.00 |
| For Judiciary Development Fund |
|
26,681.20 |
| For Philippine Mediation Fund |
|
9,750.00 |
| For Sheriff Trust Fund/Process Server’s Fee |
|
1,000.00 |
| For Fiduciary Fund |
|
325,900.00 |
| TOTAL |
₱ |
382,758.20 |
Acting on the report and recommendation of the OCA, the Court, by Resolution of January 15, 2007,11 resolved to
1. REDOCKET the instant report as regular administrative complaint against Mrs. Marcela V. Santos, Clerk of Court II, Municipal Trial Court, San Leonardo, Nueva Ecija;
2. DIRECT Clerk of Court Marcela V. Santos, within ten (10) days from notice, to:
a. RESTITUTE the amount of ₱325,900.00 and ₱1,000.00 representing her balance of accountability for Fiduciary Fund and Sheriff Trust Find/Process Server’s Fee, respectively;
b. WITHDRAW the interest earned on deposits of Fiduciary Fund in the total amount of ₱2,414.65, deposit the same to the account of the JDF, and submit to the Fiscal Monitoring Division, Court Management Office, OCA, the machine validated deposit slip relative thereto; and
c. SUBMIT to the Fiscal Monitoring Division, Court Management Office, OCA, the original copies of the 3 booklets of unaccounted Official Receipts.
3. SUSPEND Clerk of Court Marcela V. Santos from the service pending resolution of the administrative matter;
4. DIRECT Acting Collecting Officer Ms. Leonida A. Ladisla to strictly comply with all courts circulars and issuances in the proper handling of Judiciary Funds; and
5. DIRECT Hon. Rixon M. Garong, Presiding Judge, to study and implement procedures that will strengthen the internal control over cash transactions of the court.
x x x x12 (emphasis in the original; underscoring supplied)
In her March 7, 2007 explanation,13 respondent stated:
x x x x
3. With much apologies, the undersigned is very sorry for the problem of shortages and lost receipts. However, she is not to be blamed in the incident because the same were brought about by the flood caused by numerous typhoons that devastated their province in the year 1998 and 2004;
4. To prove and clear all her accountabilities, the undersigned will be presenting documents, records and other evidence to give light to the shortages. However, if the same does not satisfactorily cover the whole amount of P325,900.00 for Fiduciary Fund and P1,000.00 for Sheriff Trust Fund/Process Server’s Fee, she will pay the remaining shortages;
5. As to the original copies of the three (3) booklets of unaccounted Official Receipts, undersigned failed to retrieve all the receipts, after the same were destroyed by flood caused by typhoon. However, she will be presenting all the receipts she had successfully retrieved and will present certifications from those who posted cashbonds that they had released and released the same;
x x x x (underscoring supplied)
The OCA, by Memorandum of August 22, 2007,14 thereupon evaluated the complaint as follows:
x x x x
Based on the Report dated November 14, 2006, of the OCA Audit Team, respondent Santos’ summary of accountabilities is as follows:
| General Fund |
₱ |
3.00 |
| Special Allowance for the Judiciary Fund (SAJF) |
|
19,424.00 |
| Judiciary Development Fund (JDF) |
|
26,681.20 |
| Philippine Mediation Fund |
|
9,750.00 |
| Sheriff Trust Fund/Process Server’s Fee |
|
1,000.00 |
| Fiduciary Fund |
|
-325,900.00 |
| Total |
₱ |
382,758.20 |
The General Fund shortage was restituted by respondent on July 21, 2006.
The SAJF shortage of ₱19,424.00 was the result of respondent’s failure to remit her collections from April 2005 to May 2006, in violation of Amended Administrative Circular No. 35-2005. The amount was restituted by respondent on July 17, 2006.
The JDF’s shortage corresponds to respondent’s collections of said account for the period November 2003 to March 2006. Respondent restituted the amount on July 17, 2006.
The last entry in the Mediation Fund cashbook was for the month of November 2004 and the court’s file of Monthly Reports of Collections and Deposit for the said fund was for October 2004 only. Evidently, the financial records of the Mediation Fund was taken for granted in violation of A.M. No. 01-10-5-SC-PHILJA.1awphi1.net Respondent restituted the ₱9,750.00 shortage on July 17, 2006.
Only one process server’s fee in the amount of ₱1,000.00 was collected by respondent based on the official receipt issued for the said account. The OR used by respondent was for the Mediation Fund Account.
The Fiduciary Fund shortage of ₱325,900.00 was also the result of respondent’s failure to deposit her collections of said account in violation of Circular NO. 13-92, which mandates the Clerks of Courts concerned to deposit, with an authorized government depositary bank, immediately or within 24 hours upon receipt of all collections from bail bonds, rental deposits and other fiduciary collections. Respondent failed to comply with said directive despite the fact that the court’s depositary bank is in Gapan City, Nueva Ecija which is less than an hour from the MTC, San Leonardo, Nueva Ecija.
The audit team also observed that the cash bonds for the following cases were withdrawn without the required supporting documents, to wit:
| Case No. |
Name of Litigants |
Documents Lacking |
| 84/85-94 |
Amelia Vallarta |
Acknowledgment Receipt |
| 12-95 |
Francisco Ingal |
Court Order |
| 92-99 |
Eric Garcia |
Acknowledgment Receipt
Court Order |
| 104-00 |
Zoilo Ngo |
Acknowledgment Receipt |
| 11-03 |
Nida Manaois |
Acknowledgment Receipt |
The three (3) booklets of OR’s that are unaccounted or missing are the following: SC OR Nos. I-7992001-799050, II-7992051-7992100 and IV-21701401-21701450.
Respondent’s failure to regularly submit monthly reports of collections and deposits as mandated by SC Circular No. 32-93 prompted the Accounting Division, Financial Management Office, OCA to withhold her salaries. Below is the list of respondent’s unsubmitted reports:
| For Fiduciary Fund |
May 2003 to June 2003; |
| |
October 2003 to March 2006 |
|
For SAJ |
November 2004 to March 2006 |
| For JDF |
March 2003 |
| |
November 2003 to March 2006 |
Respondent requests for a recomputation of her accountabilities in view of the restitutions she made. Notably, the total amount she had restituted has already been deducted from her total accountability. Thus, only the shortages for the fiduciary fund and sheriff trust fund/process server’s fee were ordered by the Court to be restituted. (emphasis and underscoring supplied)
The OCA concluded/RECOMMENDED:
In view of the foregoing, only a partial suspension of the Court’s January 15, 2007 Resolution is in order, i.e., particularly the directive to respondent Santos to restitute the amount of ₱325,900.00 and ₱1,000.00 representing her balance of accountability for Fiduciary Fund and Sheriff Trust Fund/Process Server’s Fee, respectively; and, the directive to submit to the Fiscal Monitoring Division, Court Management Office (CMO), OCA, the original copies of the 3 booklets of unaccounted OR’s. This is in order to give respondent the final opportunity to produce and present her evidence. In this connection, respondent Santos should be given ten (10) days from notice within which to present to the Fiscal Monitoring Division, CMO, OCA all the documents, records and other evidence pertaining to her shortages and the 3 booklets of unaccounted OR’s. (emphasis and underscoring supplied)
Acting on the recommendation of the OCA, the Court, by Resolution of October 8, 2007,15 resolved to:
1. REQUIRE respondent to MANIFEST to the Court whether she is willing to submit this matter for resolution on the basis of the pleadings filed within ten (10) days from notice;
2. DIRECT Mrs. Marcela V. Santos to PRODUCE and PRESENT before the Fiscal Monitoring Division, Court Management Office (CMO), OCA, within ten (10) days from notice: all the "documents, records and other evidence" pertaining to her shortages on the Fiduciary Fund and Sheriff Trust Fund/Process Server’s Fee, as well as the evidence on the original copies of the three (3) booklets of unaccounted or missing Supreme Court Official Receipts;
3. DIRECT the Fiscal Monitoring Division, CMO, OCA to REPORT to the Court, with the necessary RECOMMENDATION, on respondent Santos’ presentation of evidence, stating clearly the resulting balance of her accountabilities on the Fiduciary Fund and Sheriff Trust Fund/Process Server’s Fee, should there still be any, and her accountability on the missing official receipts, within fifteen (15) days after respondent Santos’ presentation of evidence;
4. DIRECT Acting Collecting Officer Ms. Leonida A. Ladisla to:
(a) WITHDRAW the interest earned on deposits of Fiduciary Fund in the total amount of ₱2,414.65, DEPOSIT the same to the account of the JDF, and SUBMIT to the Fiscal Monitoring Division, Court Management Office, OCA, the corresponding machine validated deposit slip, within ten (10) days from notice; and
(b) STRICTLY COMPLY with all court circulars and issuances in the proper handling of Judiciary Funds; and
5. DIRECT Hon. Rixon M. Garong, Presiding Judge, to study and implement procedures that will strengthen the internal control over the cash transactions of the court.16 (emphasis in the original)
To date, the Court is not aware of the whereabouts of respondent who failed to comply with the Court’s Resolution of October 8, 2007.17 She was last heard on March 7, 2007 when she filed her March 7, 2007 explanation,18 pertinent portions of which were quoted above.
Acting on the March 29, 201019 Memorandum of the OCA, the Court, by Resolution of July 28, 2010,20 resolved to determine the liabilities of respondent on the basis of the records.
The Court finds that, indeed, respondent failed to regularly submit monthly reports of collections and deposits, as required by SC Circular No. 32-93, and official receipts and other documents, despite this Court’s repeated orders. In incurring shortage of accountabilities in the amount of ₱326,900, respondent is guilty of gross dishonesty and grave misconduct.1avvphi1
[N]o position demands greater moral righteousness and uprightness from the occupant than does the judicial office. The safekeeping of funds and collections is essential to the goal of an orderly administration of justice, and protestation of good faith can override the mandatory nature of the circulars designed to promote full accountability for government funds. The failure to remit the funds in due time amounts to dishonesty and grave misconduct, which the Court cannot tolerate for they diminish the people’s faith in the judiciary. The act of misappropriating judiciary funds constitutes dishonest and grave misconduct which are punishable by dismissal from the service even if committed for the first time.21 (underscoring supplied)
It can never be overemphasized that a clerk of court, like respondent, is responsible for court records and physical facilities of the court and is accountable for the court’s money and property deposits, following Section B, Chapter 1 of the 1991 Manual for Clerks of Court and 2002 Revised Manual for Clerks of Court.22
Under Section 23 of Rule XIV of the Omnibus Rules implementing Book V of Executive Order 292 and other pertinent Civil Service Laws, gross misconduct and dishonesty are both punishable by DISMISSAL from the service.
WHEREFORE, respondent, Marcela V. Santos, Clerk of Court II, Municipal Trial Court of San Leonardo, Nueva Ecija, is declared GUILTY of Gross Dishonesty and Grave Misconduct. She is ordered DISMISSED from the service with forfeiture of all retirement benefits, excluding accrued leave credits, and with prejudice to reemployment in any government office including government-owned and controlled corporations.
For failure to return the required documents despite repeated orders of the Court, respondent is likewise declared GUILTY of contempt of court. She is ordered to pay a FINE of Five Thousand Pesos (₱5,000) and to submit all the required documents to the Office of the Court Administrator within thirty days from receipt of this Decision.
The Fiscal Management Office, Office of the Court Administrator, is DIRECTED to process the terminal leave benefits of respondent with dispatch and apply the same to her accountabilities, giving priority to the Fiduciary Fund Account of the Municipal Trial Court of San Leonardo, Nueva Ecija.
Upon submission of the missing documents by respondent, the Fiscal Management Office is DIRECTED to compute the remaining accountabilities of respondent, if any, and to submit a report thereon within thirty days from compliance by respondent.
Respondent is further ordered to RESTITUTE the amount of Three Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Nine Hundred Pesos (₱325,900) representing shortage in the Fiduciary Fund, and One Thousand Pesos (₱1,000) representing shortage of the Sheriff Trust Fund/Process Server’s Fee.
Finally, the Office of the Court Administrator is DIRECTED to initiate appropriate criminal proceedings against respondent in light of the above findings of the Court.
SO ORDERED.
RENATO C. CORONA
Chief Justice
(ON OFFICIAL LEAVE)
ANTONIO T. CARPIO*
Associate Justice |
CONCHITA CARPIO MORALES
Associate Justice |
PRESBITERO J. VELASCO, JR.
Associate Justice |
ANTONIO EDUARDO B. NACHURA
Associate Justice |
TERESITA J. LEONARDO-DE CASTRO
Associate Justice |
(ON LEAVE)
DIOSDADO M. PERALTA**
Associate Justice |
MARIANO C. DEL CASTILLO
Associate Justice |
ARTURO D. BRION
Associate Justice |
LUCAS P. BERSAMIN
Associate Justice |
(ON OFFICIAL LEAVE)
ROBERTO A. ABAD*
Associate Justice |
MARTIN S. VILLARAMA, JR.
Associate Justice |
JOSE PORTUGAL PEREZ
Associate Justice |
JOSE CATRAL MENDOZA
Associate Justice |
MARIA LOURDES P. A. SERENO
Associate Justice |
Footnotes
* On Official Leave.
** On Leave.
1 Rollo, p. 6.
2 Ibid.
3 Ibid.
4 Ibid.
5 Id. at 7.
6 Id. at 7.
7 Id. at 8.
8 Ibid.
9 Id. at 9.
10 Ibid.
11 Id. at 23-24.
12 Ibid.
13 Id. at 51-53.
14 Id. at 60-65.
15 Id. at 66-67.
16 Ibid.
17 Ibid.
18 Id. at 51-53.
19 Id. at 107-109.
20 Id. at 111-112.
21 OCA v. Nolasco, A.M. No. P-06-2148, March 4, 2009, 580 SCRA 471, 487.
22 OCA v. Canque, A.M. No. P-04-1830, June 4, 2009, 588 SCRA 226, 235.
The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation
