Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. Nos. L-21457 and L-21461 April 29, 1966
PHILIPPINES ASSOCIATION OF FREE LABOR UNIONS (PAFLU), petitioners,
vs.
THE BUREAU OF LABOR RELATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND/OR ITS AGENT, respondent.
Seno, Mendoza, Ruiz and Associates, for petitioner.
Cipriano Cid and Associates for intervenor PAFLU.
Legal Counsel of Department of Labor for respondent Bureau of Labor Relations.
BARRERA, J.:
This is an original petition filed in this Court by the Philippine Association of Free Labor Unions (PAFLU), praying for an order "enjoining the Bureau of Labor Relations and/or any of its agents to desist from conducting of Insular Lumber Company at Fabrica, Negros Occidental on June 28, 1963, until after their Honorable Court of Industrial Relations shall have resolved the Allied Workers Association's motion for reconsideration and your Petitioner's 'Urgent Motion to Hold in Abeyance the Holding of Certification Election' ".
It is alleged that petitioner PAFLU and the Allied Workers Association filed separate motions in the Court of Industrial Relations, to hold in abeyance the enforcement of its order of May 31, 1963 (In Cases Nos. 63-MC and 64-MC), calling for the holding of certification election to determine the proper collective bargaining agent or employer unit for the workers of Insular Lumber Company, which election would be participated in by herein petitioner union and 3 others having members among the workers. The unions, in these motions, claimed that the holding of election among the workers of the company at Fabrica, Negros Occidental, would deprive those working in its South Negros operations at Hinoba-an, Negros Occidental, of their right to participate in the selection of their bargaining representatives. Since the certification elections, as directed in the order of the Industrial Court, was set for June 28, 1963 by the Bureau of Labor Relations (the office in charge of the aforementioned motions of the unions still remained unresolved, the present petition was filed on the latter date, obviously with a view to preventing the holding of the scheduled certification election.
This petition was given due course and the respondent Bureau of Labor Relations was required to answer the allegations thereof, but no preliminary restraining order directive to hold the elections as scheduled, on June 28, 1963. The respondent Bureau of Labor Relations failed to file an answer and the parties did not file any brief. When this case was called for hearing on December 11, 1963, none of the parties appeared.1äwphï1.ñët
The issue in these cases is whether the certification election to determine the proper collective bargaining representative for the workers of the Insular Lumber Company should be held on June 28, 1963, before the motions of the unions, pending before the Industrial Court, were resolved. Considering that nearly three years had passed since the scheduled-date for the holding of the elections without the parties informing this Court of any action that had been taken in the premises, and in view of the failure of the parties to present any other issue, these cases may now be dismissed for lack of justifiable controversy. No costs. So ordered.
Bengzon, C.J., Bautista Angelo, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Dizon, Regala, Makalintal, Bengzon, J.P., and Sanchez, JJ., concur.
Zaldivar, J., took no part.
The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation
