Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. L-15754             January 31, 1963
NORTH CAMARINES LUMBER COMPANY, INC., plaintiff-appellant,
vs.
METROPOLITAN INSURANCE COMPANY, defendant-appellant.
Sycip, Salazar & Associates for plaintiff-appellant.
Jose Ma. Recto for defendant-appellant.
BAUTISTA ANGELO, J.:
Plaintiff, a corporation, brought this action before the Court of First Instance of Manila against defendant recover certain sums of money in the form of insurance proceeds for the loss of a vessel and its cargo and certain repairs done on another vessel..
For the loss of the vessel and cargo, plaintiff prays for judgment in the aggregate amount of P135,000.00, with interest thereon, plus 15% attorney's fees; and for repairs, the sum of P35,520.37, with interest thereon, plus 22% of premiums paid, and 15% attorney's fees.
Defendant set up a counterclaim of P24,578.00 as attorney's fees alleging malice in the filing of the complaint on the part of plaintiff.
Wherefore, the parties respectfully pray that the foregoing stipulation of facts be admitted and approved by this Honorable Court, without prejudice to the parties adducing other evidence to prove their case not covered by this stipulation of facts. 1äwphï1.ñët
In the decision rendered on June 11, 1959, the court a quo, though it dismissed the first cause of action, it however ordered defendant to return to plaintiff as premium the amount of P2,500.00, and with regard to the second cause of action, it ordered defendant to pay to plaintiff the sum of P31,301.01. Nothing was said about the counterclaim of defendant.
Both parties have appealed assigning to their briefs questions of fact and of law
In this instance, plaintiff-appellant prays on its first cause of action that defendant-appellant be ordered to pay the sum of P135,000.00, plush 12% interest and damages pursuant to Republic Act No. 487; and on its second cause of action, that defendant-appellant be ordered to pay the amount of attorney's fees and other expenses prayed for the complaint. Defendant-appellant in turn prays that the portion of the decision relative to the second cause of action sentencing defendant-appellant to pay the amount of P30,561.01 representing costs of repairs and the sum of P440.00 for the lay days be reversed, dismissing plaintiff's second cause of action with costs.
It appearing that the amounts claimed by both plaintiff and defendant separately do not reach the amount of P200,000.00, and considering that the amounts claimed by both parties should not be considered jointly in the determination of the corresponding appellate jurisdiction, the court resolved that this case comes under the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals.
WHEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that this case he certified to the Court of Appeals.
Bengzon, C.J., Padilla, Labrador, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Paredes, Dizon, Regala and Makalintal, JJ., concur.
The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation