Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. L-14241 February 26, 1962
INOCENCIO MIJARES, ET AL., plaintiffs-appellants,
vs.
JULIAN ADIGUE, ET AL., defendants-appellees.
Jose L. Almario and Manuel F. Almario for plaintiffs-appellants.
Santiago Hermosa for defendants-appellees.
DIZON, J.:
On January 30, 1957, the spouses Inocencio Mijares and Coronacion Ipos filed an action for forcible entry in connection with a parcel of land situated in the Municipal of Palanas, Province of Masbate, against Julian Adigue and his son, Pedro, in the Justice of the Peace Court of said municipality. After due trial thereat the court ordered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. From said judgment the defendants appealed to the Court of First Instance of Masbate where the case was docketed as Civil Case No. 816.
On October 5, 1957, Hon. Ambrosio T. Dollete of the Court of First Instance of Bataan, 5th Judicial District, assigned temporarily to the Court of First Instance of Masbate, 10th Judicial District, issued Administrative Order No. 4 which reads partly as follows: .
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
No. 4 | October 5, 1957 |
In the interest of the administration of justice and pursuant to the provisions of Sections 87 and 88 of Republic Act. No. 296, the following criminal and civil cases are hereby referred to the Justice of the Peace of Masbate, Masbate, for trial on the merits and for him to render judgment therein: .
x x x x x x x x x
Civil Case No. 816 - Inocencio Mijares, et al. vs. Julian Adigue, et al. |
On January 10, 1958, prior to the trial of the case before the Justice of the Peace Court of Masbate, counsel for the plaintiffs filed a motion for the return of the case to the Court of First Instance of Masbate, for trial on merits, alleging that under Section 88 of Republic Act No. 296 jurisdiction to try and decide the same could not be delegated to the Justice of the Peace Court of Masbate. Said court, upon plaintiffs' insistence on their motion after the same had been denied in open court, on motion of defendants, issued an order dated January 13, 1958 dismissing the case. Hence this appeal.
The issue to be resolved, therefore, is whether or not the Court of First Instance of Masbate had authority to delegate the trial and disposition of the case to the Justice of the Peace Court of the provincial capital.1äwphï1.ñët
Section 88 of the Judiciary Act of 1948, as amended reads as follows: .
The jurisdiction of a justice of the peace and judge of a municipal court shall not extend to civil actions in which the subject of litigation is not capable of pecuniary estimation, except in forcible entry and detainer cases; nor to those which involve the legality of any tax, impost or assessment; nor to actions involving admiralty or maritime jurisdiction; nor to matters of probate, the appointment of trustees, or receivers; nor to actions for annulment of marriages; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, That justices of the peace who are duly qualified members of the bar may, with the approval of the Secretary of Justice, be assigned by the respective district judge in each case to hear and determine cadastral or land registration cases covering lots where there is no controversy or opposition, or contested lots the value of which does not exceed five thousand pesos, such value to be ascertained by the affidavit of the claimant or by agreement of the respective claimants, if there are more than one, or from the corresponding declaration of real property. (Emphasis supplied).
In the light of the above provision — which is the one relied upon to justify the delegation of jurisdiction herein in question — we believe that an action for forcible entry cannot be the subject of such delegation. Moreover, appellant claims — and this claim has not been denied — that the administrative order that made the delegation was not approved by the then Secretary of Justice, as required by the legal provision quoted above.
WHEREFORE, the decision appealed from is reversed with instructions that the record of Civil Case No. 816 of the Court of First Instance of Masbate should be returned by the Justice of the Peace Court of the municipality of Masbate to the aforesaid court, for trial on the merits and judgment.
Without special pronouncement as to costs.
Bengzon, C.J., Padilla, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Paredes and De Leon, JJ., concur.
The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation
