Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. L-3835 November 15, 1951
THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee,
vs.
JUANITO JAULA, defendant-appellant.
Office of the Solicitor General Pompeyo Diaz and Solicitor Esmeraldo Umali for plaintiff-appellee.
E.A. Picazo for defendant-appellant.
PARAS, C. J.:
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of First Instance of Iloilo, finding the appellant, Juanito Jaula, guilty of murder with slight physical injuries, and sentencing him to reclusion perpetua, to indemnify the heirs of the deceased, Rosa (Generosa) Pudadera, in the sum of two thousand pesos, without subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, to the accessory penalties prescribed by law, and to pay the costs.
The evidence for the prosecution tends to show that on and prior to November 24, 1949, the appellant lived with his two children in the house of his sister-in-law, Generosa Pudadera, in the barrio of Kabalabagman, Mina, municipality of Pototan, Province of Iloilo. Appellant's wife was sick and lived with her father in a house adjoining that of Generosa's. According to prosecution witness Eduardo Seballos, the appellant, in a conversation which took place in the afternoon of November 24, 1949, revealed the fact that he wanted to take away his children from the house of Generosa, but the latter resisted his desire, the appellant then and there threatening to kill Generosa, in the absence of her husband, if she would not give his children in the evening. Indeed, at about eleven o'clock that night, Gabriel Pudadera, who also lived in the house of her sister Generosa, was awakened when the latter called for help. Gabriel who was sleeping about two meters away from her sister, thereupon saw the appellant stab Generosa with a dagger as she lay on the floor face downward. Gabriel attempted to come to his sister's aid, but the appellant also struck him on the forehead and thereupon left. The next morning, the police authorities of January, Iloilo, to whom the appellant surrendered with a dagger, turned him to the police authorities of Pototan. According to prosecution witness Leonidas Dosado, the appellant had admitted before the police authorities of Janiuay that he stabbed Generosa Pudadera.
Dr. Manuel Silva, President of the Sanitary Division of Pototan, who examined Generosa's dead body, made the following findings: "1. Wound: stabbed, thru and thru, point of entrance left external axillary line about the 4th intercostas space, measuring about 4 cms. long, point of exit about 3 cms. long. 2. Wound: incised, across the right palm measuring about 8 cms. long. Cause of death, internal and external hemorrhages." The same officer examined the injury received by Gabriel Pudadera, and he testified that said injury did not need any medical attendance.
The appellant alleged, in defense, that he did not stab Generosa Pudadera and what really happened was that he came to the house of Generosa in the afternoon of November 24, 1949, and inquired why one of his children was crying, Generosa told him that Gabriel beat him for his refusal to go home although it was already late at night. Reproached for his act, Gabriel immediately struck the appellant on the back with a piece of wood. As the appellant rose from his chair, he was again hit by Gabriel. Although the appellant succeeded in wresting the club from Gabriel, the latter was able to get hold of a kitchen knife. As Gabriel was about to hit the appellant with the knife, Generosa intervened and received the blow intended for the appellant. Again attacked by Gabriel, the appellant was able to wrest the knife with which he wounded Gabriel on the head. He then left for the house of his father in barrio Karanas, Janiuay, Iloilo, and surrendered the next morning to the police authorities of Janiuay upon hearing that Generosa died and the police was after him.
There can be no doubt about the culpability of the appellant. Earlier on the day in question he had manifested his resentment over the refusal of Generosa Pudadera to part with his children and correspondingly threatened to kill Generosa. The location of the principal fatal wound of Generosa confirms the theory of the prosecution and is inconsistent with appellant's allegation that the deceased was accidentally hit by Gabriel. The testimony of Dr. Silva is quite decisive against appellants position. Moreover, the appellant admitted to the police authorities of Janiuay that he stabbed Generosa. And appellant's counsel de oficio, convinced of the correctness of the judgment of conviction, merely contends that the crime committed by the appellant is homicide, because there is no evidence that Generosa was sleeping when attacked or that she already had her face downward when the appellant first stabbed her. Gabriel Pudadera testified, however, the inmates of the house of Generosa Pudadera were asleep, except the appellant, and his testimony is entitled to credence, especially when it is borne in mind that the incident took place about eleven o'clock in the evening.
The trial court considered the aggravating circumstance of disregard of the respect due the offended party on account of her sex, offset by the mitigating circumstance of voluntary surrender. In our opinion, it was error to appreciate the circumstance of sex, because there is here no showing that the appellant, aside from the unlawful taking of the life of a woman, manifested any specific insult or disrespect towards her. (U.S. vs. De Jesus, 14 Phil., 190; People vs. Metran 89 Phil., 543). As pointed out by the Solicitor General, the trial court also erred in not imposing upon the appellant a separate penalty for slight physical injuries inflicted upon Gabriel Pudadera, in accordance with paragraph 2 of article 266 of the Revised Penal Code. There being one mitigating circumstance, the prescribed penalties should be imposed in the minimum period. Wherefore, it being understood that the appellant is sentenced, for murder, to the indeterminate penalty of from 12 years, prision mayor, to 20 years, reclusion temporal, and, for slight physical injuries, to 10 days of arresto menor, the appealed judgment is in all other respects affirmed. So ordered with costs.
Feria, Pablo, Bengzon, Padilla, Tuason, Reyes, Jugo and Bautista Angelo, JJ., concur.
The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation
