Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. L-8650 December 29, 1913
HENRY M. JONES applicant, and GLICERIA AVELINO DEL ROSARIO, opponent-appellant,
vs.
H. E. SCHIFFBAUER, opponent-appellee.
Vicente Rodriguez, for appellant.
W. A. Kincaid and Thos. L. Hartigan, for appellee.
TORRES, J.:
Whereas, upon an examination of the evidence in this case and in accordance with the merits thereof, it is held the real property is directly liable for the payment of the land tax assessed against it; and
Whereas, when such property is sold, in accordance with the procedure established by the administrative laws, for delinquency in payment of the said tax, the right of the owner thereof, who failed to pay such tax to the Government, is essentially affected by the said sale in such wise that if within one year thereafter he does not avail himself of his right to redeem such property, sold for collection of the taxes due thereon, the purchaser acquires it absolutely and its former lawful owner is finally deprived of the same, both because he failed to comply with his duty to pay a lawful tax and because he voluntarily waived the excercise of his right to redeem the property within the period of one year fixed by law; and
Whereas, the sale made by the Bureau of Internal Revenue is valid and effective, pursuant to the administrative and civil laws, so long as by final judgment it be not declared null and void for some sound legal reason, as so held an the judgment appealed from in the case at bar, in which the right to petition the courts for annulment of such a sale was reserved to the opponent, H. E. Schiffbauer; and
Whereas, so long as the aforementioned sale in the present case subsists, the rights therefrom derived, which pertain to the applicant, Gliceria Avelino del Rosario, should be respected:lawphil.net
Therefore, without prejudice to amplifying the foregoing considerations later on, we hereby reverse the judgment of dismissal appealed from and order that the record be remanded to the Court of Land Registration, together with a copy of this decision, so that it may pass upon the petitioner's application in accordance with the law and take such other action in the premises as justice may require.
Arellano, C.J., Johnson and Carson, JJ., concur.1awphi1.net
Moreland and Trent, JJ., dissent.
The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation
