Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. 1482 February 29, 1904
THE UNITED STATES, complainant-appellee,
vs.
ANTONIO FERNANDEZ, defendant-appellant.
Antonio Fernandez on his behalf.
Office of the Solicitor-General Araneta for appellee.
The defendant, who is a member of the Constabulary, went to the house of the father of the complaining witness, together with some other members of the corps, for the purpose of searching the house for firearms. No arms were found. His men having gone into a barn near by, the defendant was left alone in the house with the complaining witness, a girl of 16. The defendant then told her that unless she would submit to him he would kill her and by threatening her with his revolver intimidated her to the point of permitting him to have sexual intercourse with her. The trial court found the defendant guilty of rape and imposed upon him the maximum penalty of seventeen years four months and one day of reclusion temporal. Against this the defendant appealed.
MAPA, J.:
The guilt of the defendant of the crime of rape with which he is charged is fully established by the proof. The crime was committed with the aggravating circumstance that the accused availed himself of his position as sergeant of the Constabulary forces to commit the crime, and with the further circumstance of its commission in the dwelling of the complaining witness. Consequently the penalty of seventeen years four months and one day of reclusion temporal imposed on the defendant by the trial judge is in accordance with law and should therefore be affirmed.
The court below also condemned the defendant to the payment of the sum of 500 pesos to the father of the complaining witness. There is no authority of law for this, and consequently the decision can not in this respect be sustained. In lieu thereof the defendant should be obliged to endow the complaining witness, who it appears is unmarried, in the sum of 500 Philippine pesos, and to acknowledge and support the offspring, should there be any, in accordance with the provision of article 449 of the Penal Code.
With this modification we affirm the judgment of the court below, with the costs of this instance against the defendant.
Arellano, C. J., Torres, Cooper and McDonough, JJ., concur.
Willard and Johnson, JJ., dissent.
The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation
