Administrative Order No. 67




MALACAÑAN PALACE MANILA BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES [ Administrative Order No. 67, July 1, 1963 ] REMOVING MR. RUFINO O. ABUDA FROM OFFICE AS JUSTICE OF THE PEACE OF QUINAPUNDAN, SAMAR. This is an administrative case filed by Mrs. Irene V. Japson against Mr. Rufino O. Abuda, justice of the peace of Quinapundan, Samar, for undue delay in disposing of Criminal Case No. 428, partiality, and acts unbecoming a public official. A formal investigation of the case was commenced by the District Judge of Samar but was later turned over to Assistant Fiscal Juan A. Abing of the same province who finds respondent guilty of unbecoming conduct, failure to conduct preliminary investigation, and undue delay in disposing of the case, and recommends that he be at least reprimanded and advised to handle his case with dispatch and in conformity with the procedure embodied in the Rules of Court. Respondent did not present any evidence but confined himself to submitting a memorandum. The investigators findings are supported by the record. It appears that a complaint for theft of large cattle with malicious mischief was filed in respondents court on June 12, 1957, alleging that the accused, Felipe Guarino, stole a carabao worth P300 belonging to herein complainants husband. Respondent set the case for preliminary investigation but tried the same on the merits, finding the accused guilty of the offense charged and sentencing him to suffer one-month imprisonment, to pay an indemnity of P200 and costs. From the decision, which was dated February 28, 1958, but promulgated only on July 7, 1958, the accused appealed to the Court of First Instance where he pleaded guilty and was sentenced to suffer an indeterminate penalty of from 3 years and 1 clay of prision correccional to 9 years, 4 months and 1 day of prison mayor and to pay an indemnity of P300, plus costs.1aшphi1 The investigation of this administrative case discloses that on several occasions before and after the trial of the criminal case involved the respondent drank beer and ate together with the accused. In another instance, a goat was slaughtered for him. These successive incidents fully explain the sympathetic attitude of the respondent towards the accused, the undue delay in the trial of the case, and the promulgation of the judgment and the light penalty imposed on him. Such open and scandalous association of the respondent with the accused whose case was pending before him and his partiality towards the accused induced by such relationship reflect adversely on his fitness as a judge. By his proven conduct, he does not deserve to remain in the judiciary where only men of high integrity and unimpeachable conduct have the right to be.ℒαwρhi৷ Wherefore, and upon the recommnedation of the Secretary of Justice, Mr. Rufino O. Abuda is hereby removed from office as justice of the peace of Quinapundan, Samar, effective upon receipt of a copy of this order. Done in the City of Manila, this 1st day of July, in the year of Our Lord, nineteen hundred and sixty-three. (Sgd.) DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL President of the Philippines By the President: (Sgd.) SALVADOR L. MARIÑO Executive Secretary The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation